Graphing within-subjects confidence intervals using SPSS and S-Plus
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.
We argue that to best comprehend many data sets, plotting judiciously selected sample statistics with associated confidence intervals can usefully supplement, or even replace, standard hypothesis-testing procedures. We note that most social science statistics textbooks limit discussion of confidence intervals to their use in between-subject designs. Our central purpose in this article is to des...
متن کاملMinimal model S(I)=0 problem in NIDDM subjects: nonzero Bayesian estimates with credible confidence intervals.
The minimal model of glucose kinetics, in conjunction with an insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test, is widely used to estimate insulin sensitivity (S(I)). Parameter estimation usually resorts to nonlinear least squares (NLS), which provides a point estimate, and its precision is expressed as a standard deviation. Applied to type 2 diabetic subjects, NLS implemented in MINMOD soft...
متن کاملEyewitness accuracy and confidence: within- versus between-subjects correlations.
Previous researchers using between-subjects comparisons have found eyewitness confidence and accuracy to be only negligibly correlated. In this study, we examined the predictive power of confidence in within-subject terms. Ninety-six subjects answered, and made confidence ratings for, a series of questions about a crime they witnessed. The average between-subjects and within-subject accuracy-co...
متن کاملGraphing confidence ellipses : An update of ellip for Stata 8
This paper describes an update of the ellip command for graphing confidence ellipses in Stata 8. Two of the most notable new features are the option to graph confidence ellipses around variable means and the ability to add inscribed lines. These features allow a geometric characterization of linear regression with unequal error variances, as in McCartin (2003).
متن کاملHow confidence intervals become confusion intervals
BACKGROUND Controversies are common in medicine. Some arise when the conclusions of research publications directly contradict each other, creating uncertainty for frontline clinicians. DISCUSSION In this paper, we review how researchers can look at very similar data yet have completely different conclusions based purely on an over-reliance of statistical significance and an unclear understand...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Behavior Research Methods
سال: 2007
ISSN: 1554-351X,1554-3528
DOI: 10.3758/bf03192846